<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: La chaîne de Ponzi des retraites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sardanapale.com/2009/07/03/la-chaine-de-ponzi-des-retraites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sardanapale.com/2009/07/03/la-chaine-de-ponzi-des-retraites/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 11:47:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sardanapale</title>
		<link>http://www.sardanapale.com/2009/07/03/la-chaine-de-ponzi-des-retraites/comment-page-1/#comment-53639</link>
		<dc:creator>Sardanapale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sardanapale.com/?p=841#comment-53639</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting debate indeeed. I note that Milton Friedman, while underscoring the unsustainability of SS, did not quite endorse the &quot;Ponzi meme&quot; in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://community.middlebury.edu/~horlache/popdev-k/Topics/Conferences/Elderly/Articles/nyt1-11a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;famous 1999 op-ed&lt;/a&gt;.

Meanwhile, mises.org had just published a &lt;a href=&quot;http://mises.org/story/3546&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Free Madoff&quot; post &lt;/a&gt;which concludes:

&quot;Just how unusually evil were Madoff&#039;s actions? Not that unusual. In fact, the whole notion of paying off past investors with the funds of present investors is at the very core of the Social Security system. At least Madoff sought the consent of his investors who let him care for their money based on their own volition. And at least he didn&#039;t attempt to defend himself with the claim that he was conducting wise public policy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting debate indeeed. I note that Milton Friedman, while underscoring the unsustainability of SS, did not quite endorse the &#8220;Ponzi meme&#8221; in a <a href="http://community.middlebury.edu/~horlache/popdev-k/Topics/Conferences/Elderly/Articles/nyt1-11a.html" rel="nofollow">famous 1999 op-ed</a>.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, mises.org had just published a <a href="http://mises.org/story/3546" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Free Madoff&#8221; post </a>which concludes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Just how unusually evil were Madoff&#8217;s actions? Not that unusual. In fact, the whole notion of paying off past investors with the funds of present investors is at the very core of the Social Security system. At least Madoff sought the consent of his investors who let him care for their money based on their own volition. And at least he didn&#8217;t attempt to defend himself with the claim that he was conducting wise public policy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean dupond</title>
		<link>http://www.sardanapale.com/2009/07/03/la-chaine-de-ponzi-des-retraites/comment-page-1/#comment-53613</link>
		<dc:creator>jean dupond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sardanapale.com/?p=841#comment-53613</guid>
		<description>Great Link to David Henderson&#039;s Blog. What is fascinating is the quality of the argument in the comments. There is one guy stating that it SS is not a Ponzi Scheme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Link to David Henderson&#8217;s Blog. What is fascinating is the quality of the argument in the comments. There is one guy stating that it SS is not a Ponzi Scheme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
